<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5: Get it Working Today (4 of 4)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4</link>
	<description>Inspiration, CSS Gallery &#38; Community News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Collection of HTML5 Resources to Move You Forward</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Collection of HTML5 Resources to Move You Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>[...] HTML5 &#8211; New Elements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HTML5 &#8211; New Elements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Glass</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>Third time is a charm.

Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of &quot;aside&quot; has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using &quot;aside&quot; as a replacement for our &quot;div id=&quot;sidebar.&quot;&quot; Now, &quot;aside&quot; can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.

(Feel free to delete that second comment of mine. I think this is right this time.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third time is a charm.</p>
<p>Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of &#8220;aside&#8221; has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using &#8220;aside&#8221; as a replacement for our &#8220;div id=&#8221;sidebar.&#8221;" Now, &#8220;aside&#8221; can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.</p>
<p>(Feel free to delete that second comment of mine. I think this is right this time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Glass</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Aww, crap. I messed that up by not quirking my HTML tags. Let’s try that last paragraph again.

Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using  as a replacement for our . Now,  can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, crap. I messed that up by not quirking my HTML tags. Let’s try that last paragraph again.</p>
<p>Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using  as a replacement for our . Now,  can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Glass</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Great series, Joshua. My personal website uses HTML5 elements for structure.

A simple CSS selector like &quot;header, footer, aside, section {display:block;} forces browsers to render these ‘unknown’ elements as blocks as opposed to inline elements. Then, as someone mentioned in one of the previous posts, you can link to a Google code that forces IE to recognize the elements as well.

I don’t really agree with your stance that HTML isn’t ready for popular use. I’d say its layout elements are, and there are ways to have older browsers display them. Then again, I am forceful when it comes to making my acquaintances update to IE8, or preferably Safari/Firefox.

Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of  has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using  as a replacement for our . Now,  can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.

Look to http://html5doctor.com/aside-revisited/ for more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series, Joshua. My personal website uses HTML5 elements for structure.</p>
<p>A simple CSS selector like &#8220;header, footer, aside, section {display:block;} forces browsers to render these ‘unknown’ elements as blocks as opposed to inline elements. Then, as someone mentioned in one of the previous posts, you can link to a Google code that forces IE to recognize the elements as well.</p>
<p>I don’t really agree with your stance that HTML isn’t ready for popular use. I’d say its layout elements are, and there are ways to have older browsers display them. Then again, I am forceful when it comes to making my acquaintances update to IE8, or preferably Safari/Firefox.</p>
<p>Also, it’s been noted by others like Chris Coyier and Mike Robinson, that the definition of  has changed. It used to restrict the element in that it should only contain secondary information relative to the article/page’s content, like a works cited section of sorts. Many developers (myself included) ignored that definition and have been using  as a replacement for our . Now,  can contain content broader content, secondary to the site as a whole. (ie, blogroll, ‘about me,’ or advertising.</p>
<p>Look to <a href="http://html5doctor.com/aside-revisited/" rel="nofollow">http://html5doctor.com/aside-revisited/</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Johnson</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://designshack.co.uk/articles/html/html5-get-it-working-today-4-of-4#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designshack.co.uk/?p=2499#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>great post and info!

cant wait until HTML5/CSS3 takes hold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post and info!</p>
<p>cant wait until HTML5/CSS3 takes hold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
